I’m not a big fan of popes, although I will admit to admiring their art collection. I’m largely suspect of the whole name change thing, even if it does work for subsequent Bozos and Ronald McDonalds, and I resent the hell out of their tax-free status.
Add the papal nod to the Nazis, coverups of abuse, opposition to reproductive rights for women and personal fallout from years of Catholic upbringing, and popes get a big thumbs down from me.
For the most part, I’m able to ignore the popeular press as it asks the old git du jour for opinions on just about everything happening in today’s world out of some misguided bow to hierarchies long beyond their sell-buy dates, but Papa Benny’s recent reaction to the British gov’t move toward a level playing field for gays is more than I’m in the mood to let slide this morning.
The Pope has sparked a major political row in Britain by speaking out strongly against the government’s policies on equality.
The effect of the government’s proposals, he said, in an address to Catholic bishops in Britain, has been to impose “unjust limitations on the freedom of religious communities to act in accordance with their beliefs”.
For starters, that “freedom of religious communities to act in accordance with their beliefs” is an old saw that has cut deeply over the centuries since religion was invented, excusing everything from mass exterminations to female genital mutilation, serving up the Kool-Aid in one form or another and forcing millions to stop with the thinking stuff and take a big ole swig.
It’s also just bloody rude for the popester to come out swinging when his upcoming trip to the UK is going to cost a bomb, as pointed out by the head of the National Secular Society:
“The taxpayer is going to be faced with a bill for £20m for the visit – in which he has indicated he will attack equal rights and promote discrimination.”
On top of it all, the elephant in the room … pink, of course … securely tethered to Ben’s insistence:
Pope Benedict XVI has condemned British equality legislation for running contrary to “natural law” as he confirmed his first visit to the UK later this year.
We’ll call that pachyderm “gay priests”.
There is no question that homosexuality in the priesthood is widespread … so to speak.
One can only wonder what Ben would have to say about ChurchOuting.Org, a website set up to out gay priests who “… stand silent while Archbishop Wuerl and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops increase their dogmatic war against gay families.”
Openly acknowledging and addressing the elephant, however, isn’t likely, but we can expect more papal bull.
Greetings from Grand Rapids Michigan!
Just sending this to let you know how I appreciated the “Papal Bull(shit) and the Pink Elephant” post, especially the line: “There is no question that homosexuality in the priesthood is widespread … so to speak.” Down with clericalism!
The way I came upon your site (I can’t help but add, so to speak) was this: I was reading about the copy of the Magna Carta in the British Library, then noticed that Pope Innocent III issued a papal bull which “annulled” it a couple months later. The phrase papal bullshit came to mind, and I googled to see who else had thought of it.
Anyway, thanks for cheering up my afternoon.
Joe Oettinger
Hi, Joe. How’s the weather in Grand Rapids?
It’s been a mild winter, but we just had several inches of snow and it’s beautiful out.
Sandra you write very well, with intelligence, honesty and humor despite the tough times you’ve describe in some of your posts!
Thanks, Joe.
Can hardly even imagine snow anymore, but that’s okay by me.